Lender Comparison
CoinRabbit vs Strike
Side-by-side comparison of rates, custody models, and loan terms.
Rate data verified May 16, 2026 · Updated weekly
CoinRabbit and Strike side by side
| CoinRabbit | Strike | |
|---|---|---|
| APR (min) | 11.95% | 7.49% |
| APR (max) | 16.8% | 11.25% |
| Max LTV | 90% | 50% |
| Min loan | — | — |
| Max loan | No stated max | No stated max |
| Custody model | lender pool | lender pool |
| Rehypothecation | No | No |
| Funding speed | — | — |
| States | — | — |
Key differences
On posted APR, Strike starts lower (7.49% vs 11.95%); whether that's the better deal depends on loan size and origination fees, both folded into the effective APR figures in our table above. CoinRabbit offers a higher maximum LTV (90% vs 50%), which means more buying power per BTC pledged but a narrower buffer before liquidation if Bitcoin's price falls.
About each lender
CoinRabbit
Operating since November 2020. $1.45B+ originated. Low $100 minimum loan, ~10 minute funding, 350+ collateral assets supported. Specific qualified custodian not disclosed publicly.
Full CoinRabbit review →Strike
Bitcoin-only loans with no origination fee. Collateral held by Strike or capital partners in segregated wallets — no named third-party qualified custodian. Proof-of-reserves published. $2.1B credit facility with Tether.
Full Strike review →Compare all 15 lenders
Filter by loan amount, BTC holdings, state, and custody preference.
Open comparison tool →borrowonbitcoin.com is a comparison publisher, not a lender or financial advisor. Data verified weekly. Full disclosures.